It has already been a year since my friend Al Terrell left this earthly plane. And almost two years sine Ann (A.V.) Christie has died. I am glad both of them are not around to find out what I discovered this morning.
I have been home with the flu, so I have been playing catch-up with municipalities. I started with East Whiteland. They have a Supervisors’ Meeting this Wednesday, January 10.
One of the things there of note, is a couple of more resignations from within the township building. One resignation is the guy who has only been there a short amount of time but came to East Whiteland from the Montgomery County Mall Township known as Upper Merion. Scott Greenly is leaving. He was/is East Whiteland’s Planning & Development Director. But I digress.
BACK to the reason for this post, only it actually what worries me was from RIGHT before Christmas (always have to pay attention before major holidays or in the dead of summer or stuff sneaks on it, right?) as in the Planning Commission December 20, 2017:
1. HP Flanagan, Inc.: Sketch plan proposing a 6 lot subdivision and associated improvements. The property is located at 100 N. Bacton Hill Road, is zoned R-1 Single Family Residential and is approximately 6.6 acres in size.
This is proposed for right on top of and across the road from….wait for it….the ruins of historic Ebenezer AME Church and Cemetery. When I last wrote about Ebenezer, it was late November, 2017 and it was about an oral history. Before that, you know all of the posts about the history and the various articles from 2016 (click HERE and click HERE for two of them.)
Well shame on me for not paying closer attention in December 2017. Here is what it looks like (100 Bacton Hill Road Sketch Plan):
Here is a close-up so you can see (right or wrong) why I am alarmed:
These houses are right on top of Ebenezer on one side. A concern I have is a lot of us have always wondered if there were more graves on each side of the fences (See blue arrows). A new development right on top of this site of ANY size puts this historic site at risk, in my humble opinion. Which is why a lot of the conversations concerning this development have to also include protecting this historic site, right?
This is a historic site that East Whiteland has never seemingly wanted to deal with (except for the historic commission as they have wanted it better preserved only how do we get there?), and the AME Church always seemingly wants to pretend it never exists. (I mean remember that promise Bishop Ingram made the Inquirer reporter Kristen Holmes to check this all out? And what do you bet he never, ever did? (Sorry I don’t see slick city bishop walking through the mud at Ebenezer, do you?)
Do we need to worry that if the AME Church finds out about development they will try to sell these old souls to the highest bidder to make a buck or two? (It’s a valid concern, I think.)
Here is a close up of general notes on the plans so the players and potential need for a variance are made plain:
Doug Buettner still owns the land now. I have met him. A nice guy. He actually helped with Al’s clean-up of Ebenezer in 2016. I have also been told that owns Malvern Court the mobile home park on the other side of Ebenezer. The developer is listed above at HP Flanagan in Malvern. They are an unknown to me.
I have been told that Mr. Buettner has wanted to develop some of this land for years. I seem to remember he mentioned it to me in conversation the day I met him cleaning up at Ebenezer.
My largest concern is how close this all is to the ruins of Ebenezer. This is not a big plan being proposed, mind you, and it would have escaped my radar except for the fact it is next door to our beloved Ebenezer. And well a development could detrimentally impact this historic site as I feel the site is fragile to begin with. I have fears that once construction vehicles move in to start construction if this plan is approved that it will cause the remains of the church to crumble from vibrations. When Al Terrell was alive we had wanted to try to get the AME Church to give permission for funds to be raised to stabilize the ruins.
A development of a 6 lot subdivision like this adjacent to a historic resource and a mobile home park is one of the ways Chester County Zoning is so strange to me. None of the things go together.
I still feel the pace of development is staggering in East Whiteland .
When does it stop? I have to ask if Mr. Buettner owns clear to the corner as I was told, would it be possible to shift those houses down? Or eliminate one from the plans to create a buffer zone next to the old souls of Ebenezer? After all, it is not generally considered good karma to disturb a burial ground is it? Freed slaves, member of a once vibrant early black community and black Civil War Soldiers matter, don’t they? Shouldn’t they?
And you see on the plans they also want setback variances? Bacton Hill Road is a speedy road. So no new development anything should be perched right on the edge of the road in my humble opinion.
Look, I wish this proposed plan, this sketch plan, wasn’t on top of Ebenezer, but it is. And Hiram Woodyard, Joshua Johnson, the Reasons and the other dear old souls here deserve respect. (See Daily Local article November 2016)
Bacton Hill is the location of some of the richest black history in Chester County. It was an early settlement of freed blacks among other things. This history here just keeps getting erased. I don’t think that is right.
Here is my wish list:
- NO development (which I doubt will happen as it is East Whiteland, after all.)
- More realistically, REDUCED development to protect the cemetery with a good buffer.
- As a condition of approval the developer gets permission to stabilize the church ruin and put up a better and more proper fence with a gate and a couple of pebbled (drainage is a problem over there already, right?) parking spaces in the buffer zone so people can visit Ebenezer.
- And developer also helps with maintaining the grass and weeds going forward
Here is hoping if something comes of this, the dead are respected, right? Ebenezer has been around since what? 1831 into 1832?
Ok signing off now. My thoughts are simple: Ebenezer should be and needs to be preserved. It is history that matters. And more people need to care. (For more on East Whiteland history click HERE.) People, this is a sketch plan, but it is under active review. If you have an opinion, please voice it to East Whiteland (politely.)
Ebenezer AME and her ruins are just something which should be saved, right?
The property is already subdivided, but for larger lots with no open space.
Can you contact me at my email to discuss