water, water everywhere
Tag Archives: phoenixville
former district attorney wants to help coatesville
It was a relatively small blip in The Daily Local and worth a conversation. Former District Attorney Joseph Carroll, now of “Of Counsel” at Obermayer, Rebmann, Maxwell & Hippel has announced that he is interested in helping Coatesville.
COATESVILLE — A former Chester County district attorney has applied with the city to become both a temporary city manager and temporary public safety coordinator for less pay than the last city manager was making.
Former District Attorney Joseph Carroll said Monday during a City Council meeting that he handed his application into the city earlier that day. He said a public safety coordinator would have the same responsibilities as a police chief but would be a civilian.“I have a lot of fond memories of the way Coatesville was,” Carroll said after the meeting. “The people here now are just as good as the people were when this city was very successful. I would like to help council make that happen again, and I think it’s possible.”
Coatesville to an outsider looking in, has seemed so lost for years. It has also been a 
victim of bad municipal management, failed bids for eminent domain for private gain, crime, and so on.
victim of bad municipal management, failed bids for eminent domain for private gain, crime, and so on.It is home to a lot of people, and is this something to be considered? Look at what Jean Krack and Paul Jannsen did and didn’t do before they moved on to wreak havoc in other municipalities, so why not look at someone who actually has a brain and a spine?
Any thoughts out there on this?
Coatesville deserves better than it has gotten for decades, so is Joseph Carroll the man to get the ball rolling?
Another thing, look at what he is willing to do it for. He has the knowledge base, and would be willing to do this at a reduced rate of pay so isn’t this a good thing to consider?
Now if there was only someone willing to do this for Phoenixville.
is phoenixville the wild, wild west?
Someone I know told me a story about Phoenixville the other day. It involved a police officer shooting a dog believed to be a pit bull mix. I am going to preface this entire post with a couple of things:
- I wasn’t there
- This was recounted to me
- Anyone who knows me knows that pit bulls are so not my breed and we will leave it at that.
- Being a police officer or any type of first responder is a very hard job with often the need for difficult decisions to be made.
However, that all being said, drawn guns in neighborhoods when there are people and even children around gives me pause.
So I was told that this dog got out of her owner’s yard. As unpleasant as that can be, it happens. The dog apparently was in an empty lot?
I am one of those people who does not like roaming dogs. At all. But I also know not to confront them.
When I was first out here in Chester County part-time, I actually called the police about two dogs on the lam. The police came out, and were completely calm and got the dogs into the police car and returned them to their owners. No muss, no fuss. And these were big dogs. Not pit bulls, or even pit mixes, but big dogs – and any dog has the potential of reacting negatively in loud, chaotic situations. Especially if the humans around are all tense and upset.
So as it was told to me, the owner of the dog, who by newspaper accounts was a Spanish-speaking woman was trying to get the dog to come to her so she could get her inside, and begging the officer not to shoot her dog? And that some on the scene have said the dog was upset but had not charged? Is it possible in the chaos that this officer made a mistake?
Again, I am not condoning loose dogs AT ALL, but I was also told that this dog was not male, but female and also had dropped a litter of puppies a few weeks ago? Is that true? Because if that is true and the dog was shot close to her home, that could have some bearing on her barking and attitude? Mother dogs will protect their young and their humans if they perceive a threat, won’t they?
It seems for an incident like this that there is a lot out there right away in the media. If the dog was a danger, then the police acted correctly albeit tragically. But, what if this dog was shot needlessly? What if that action was a bit precipitous? What if part of the stress of the situation was a language barrier between responding officer and the Spanish-speaking woman?
I for one would like to know. It kind of freaks me out when people shoot dogs.
Phoenixville seems to have issues. And it seems they might need to address their issues versus building a platinum coated municipal building, doesn’t it?
Sign me torn on this issue. Can anyone tell me if Phoenixville has an animal control person or a relationship with say the Chester County SPCA or anyone else who could assist in these situations?
I respect the difficult jobs police officers and first responders have. I want no misunderstanding there. But I also know how dogs react when threatened. And if this dog was just scared and was a female who had a litter of puppies close by?
Or if loose dogs are such an issue in Phoenixville then maybe the officials should spend a little more time educating the public on how bad that can be?
Again, sign me torn with many questions. I know many people with what qualify as breeds of dogs that are larger and working. And when I read things like this, it scares me that something like that could happen to their dogs if they accidentally got out.
Here’s the press on this:
Phoenixville Police Shoot, Kill Threatening Dog
The animal was shot near Barkley Elementary School on Monday.
A dog that appeared to be part pit bull was shot and killed by Phoenixville Police on Monday after it went on a rampage, The Mercury is reporting. The animal was shot once before later dying at the vet.
PHOENIXVILLE — A dog acting aggressively, trapping residents in their cars and homes, forced police to shoot and kill it Monday afternoon.Police Chief William Mossman said the dog, described as being brown with “some pit bull in him but bigger than a pit bull,” charged officers multiple times while growling and barking….A woman driving by in a car told the officers she knew who owned the dog….One of the officers went to the owner’s house nearby. A woman reportedly confirmed she owned the dog but did not know it had gotten out or where it was…..“(The officer) wanted to give the dog every opportunity,” he said. “It’s our responsibility, we have to protect the public. The officer was protecting himself and the crowd.”….Mossman emphasized that there was little to no danger for the public related to the actual firing of the officer’s gun. The officer involved is about six feet tall and was shooting on a down angle so the bullet wouldn’t have gone anywhere if he missed, Mossman said…. Additionally, Mossman said the officer involved is highly trained, a former marine that is also a part of the Northern Chester County Emergency Response Team. “That guy spends more time shooting and qualifying more than anyone,” he said. “We don’t like to shoot our guns in the borough if we can avoid it.”
on a clear day you can see forever….
Got billboard? Or billboard fight in your community?
I just want everyone to take a good, long look at the ugliness that is the GIANT billboard on 202 in Westtown that is LIT UP 24/7. Phoenixville, Bryn Mawr, Haverford Township, wherever you are, this bit of ugliness is why when someone comes to your town and says they have loverly billboards, you just want to say “no”. It’s pretty much always the same guy around here, so he should be used to rejection by now.
well, when you hire what coatesville ejects, what do you expect phoenixville?
So the other day I wrote a post about Phoenixville and their governmental quest for a Platinum-clad multi-million dollar borough hall.
And today as I am reading an article in Phoenixville Patch, a name literally leapt off the page: Phoenixville Borough manager Jean Krack . As in former Coatesville Redevelopment Authority head and acting city manager then City Manager of Coatesville Jean Krack.
Lordy how do these old Coatesville people keep getting jobs? I started to pay attention to Coatesville years ago when under Paul Janssen they tried to sieze the farm of my friends Dick and Nancy Saha via eminent domain for private gain. (Don’t remember? See Save Our Farm’s website.)
Now I thought it was bad enough when Radnor in the midst of the Bashore drama thought about bringing in Paul Janssen in 2010 as a then temporary township manager.
So if my memory serves, didn’t Jean Krack fill in as acting city manager of Coatesville when Paul Janssen went buh bye? First they hailed him as the second coming of something or another, and then wasn’t their some fuzzy math about some $7 million borrowed from some sort of trust fund to keep Coatesville going circa 2005? And then there was some sort of blame game in Coatesville in the first few months of 2006? And then on March 14, 2006 the Times Herald reported under Ann Pickering that Jean Krack was fired as Coatesville’s City Manager? And then he turns up again in Phoenixville in 2008?
OMG it all makes sense now. When will people stop hiring people Coatesville gets rid of??? I mean let’s get real, for years can it be said that Jean Krack talks a good game but doesn’t quite have the follow-thru in the end? He is good at spending money, however. Haven’t taxes gone up under Krack? Wasn’t it reported in The Phoenix at the end of 2011 that taxes were going up 19%? And the year before that didn’t the Phoenix report a 24% increase?
(Oh and as a Phoenixville aside don’t forget about those condos that did not sell. They get auctioned off on April 15th as per the Mercury.)
Now part of the discussion surrounding this new Phoenixville Borough Hall isn’t just the cost but the stormwater/flooding concerns. Remember the thing in the Inquirer in September about water stuff?
Chester County Inbox: Water-boiling rumor generates steam by Kathleen Brady Shea
So they are taking this all so seriously now that they are moving forward with the Phoenixville Pagoda? Nice.
So back to Phoenixville in the news. Here’s a little article from 2008 I found amusing on a couple of different levels:
Planners: Limit public comments?
Published: Saturday, August 16, 2008
How very West Vincent of him, or maybe this was another place West Vincent looked for inspiration on the public comment debate? It doesn’t really matter – what matters is in my opinion government officials who seek to limit public comment are immediately suspect for that alone. Of course in this case, I am amused by his touting his tour of duty in Coatesville since in the end they fired him as per all media reports, right?
But I digress. My whole point is Phoenixville hired one of the managers that Coatesville fired.
Now I know Jean Krack like most municipal talking heads would like to take credit for all of the renaissance which has occurred in Phoenixville, but I think a lot of credit needs to go to the small business owners and residents themselves.
But back to Krack and his quest for a Platinum-clad Phoenixville Pagoda – check out the latest coverage in Phoenixville Patch:
Seems to me that Krack seems a little desperate to get this building shoved through? That in and of itself is enough to make residents want to hit pause in my humble opinion. I also think that Phoenixville needs to remember that the residents are the taxpayers and they in essence pay the Borough Manager’s salary.
I will say again I do not understand how Phoenixville’s Borough Manager and council people can justify the expense of this new borough hall in this economy. It was reported mid March by the Phoenixville Patch that they were considering cutting the police force. I don’t know about you, but if I lived in Phoenixville I would rather have the right sized police force, the necessary services, repaired roads (Phoenixville has lots of missing street signs and a lot of pot holes) versus a ginormous municipal building in an area they say floods. Also at that meeting, Patch reported concerns from residents over a couple of development plans. (and don’t forget that auction of condos April 15th as per the Mercury.)
Well maybe it’s just me, but the design of this building isn’t much better than the giant Acme Market being built on Lancaster Avenue in Bryn Mawr. But what do I know? I am just a mere mortal and a female….now see if I was in Phoenixville I would talk to the folks in Radnor who inherited the mess of THAT too super-sized municipal building. I am pretty sure they seem to think NOW that they built too large a temple of excess there too a few years ago.
No one wants a butt ugly municipal building. But there should be a common sense approach as to what can really be afforded and a happy medium between a quonset hut and something along the lines of the Taj Mahal.
Now is not the time to build the Taj Mahal. It’s a shame they can’t do an adaptive reuse of an existing building – or even part of that old steel site now being developed. (in that case, wouldn’t it have made an interesting argument to see what the developer who is doing the steel site development would have been willing to do?) But again, I am but a mere mortal and a female on the outside looking in.
why does phoenixville need a main line expensive borough hall?
Phoenixville is a lovely place. Phoenixville is also cash strapped. I have heard that Phoenixville has plans for an $8 million dollar township building/borough hall? Is it true this building will be purportedly be built in a location that floods regularly when the water comes up? Is it also true they are supposed to have flood mitigation plans — the first level will be a garage which will NOT take care of the flood issues, and the lack of proper flood planning when building in a flood plain will equal potential law suits won’t it?
Of course why a community with little to no money needs a Main Line expensive muni building escapes me, doesn’t it escape you? I am told that at a recent public meeting residents asked about this and were basically shooed off and brushed off with their questions?
Wow, really, Phoenixville? Everyone gets you don’t want to end up like a hybrid cross between Pottstown and Norristown, but building a borough hall that is Main Line expensive with many questions with regard to flooding issues isn’t a smart way to spend taxpayer money, is it?
Phoenixville would be better serving residents if they behaved more sensibly. Phoenixville needs to take care of her residents and the businesses that have taken a chance on this town. Building a giant flood prone municipal building in a box won’t accomplish that.
Below is some background from Phoenixville Patch and I hope lots of local media takes a goooood long long at how the officials in Phoenixville want to spend $8 million dollars in a piss poor economy.
Seems to me that Phoenixville has $8 million reasons to proceeed with caution, doesn’t it?
Council Gets a Look at New Borough Hall During Hearing
A conditional use hearing was held for a new borough hall on Bridge Street.
By Lynn Jusinski Email the author March 16, 2012
Conditional Use Hearing for New Borough Hall Planned
The hearing will take place at council’s March meeting.
ByLynn Jusinski Email the author February 21, 2012
Phoenixville Council Moves Forward on Borough Hall, Infrastructure Bond
Council voted 7-1 to pursue a bond for $7.5 to $10.5 million.
phoenixville
being discussed in chester county: pennsylvania and politics of the uterus
I am going to wade into uncomfortable waters in conservative Chester County. I found a post on the Phoenixville Patch that is worth discussing. It is by a woman name Lisa Longo. Apparently Politics of the Uterus is the key to 2012 politics in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Here is an excerpt:
Blog: What is the GOP Thinking? And Why Are They in My Uterus?
I have to say, I never expected the GOP to so totally torpedo itself.
How could they have mishandled everything to this extent? First they unleash their extreme caucus, also known as the “tea” “party,” which leads to the birth of the Occupy Movement. Then they decide to take the party right off the cliff by picking a fight with women, and not just any one woman, they made ALL of us angry over the non-issue (to women) on their issue of contraception in health care.
And now some State Legislators are attempting to pass heinous, invasive and unconstitutional bills that will insist a woman be given a mandatory ultrasound prior to abortion. It is beyond offensive….
Which brings me to another interesting movement born recently, the call for a nationwide day of protest in state capitals. Karen Teegarden had an idea, to bring women together and raise our voices and let legislators know we have had enough. What started as the We are Women march has now become the United Against the War on Women March, and it is going to be one amazing day of nationwide protests. More info at: https://www.facebook.com/?ref=tn_tnmn#!/UniteWomen?sk=wall
This day of national protest will be our message to the GOP: stop assaulting my rights! And to tell you the truth, I feel constantly assaulted by the GOP. Starting with my arrest at the first Tar Sands, and the constant fight to get the FRAC Act passed, the repeated fight to stop the Keystone XL, the cuts to education, health and welfare, and now this, the final insult, they want to take away my right to control my own body…..The bill in PA is scheduled for a March 12 vote. Between now and then we need a fast, and furious, campaign, to make sure the GOP is put on notice: vote yes on this bill and we will do everything we can to make sure you are not re-elected. It is time to explain to legislators in no uncertain terms that the GOP has no business in my uterus.
What a woman chooses to do with her own body is a personal matter and neither legislators, or men in clerical (methinks the Catholic Church needs to deal with it’s out of control and pedophile priests before they open their mouths further) or judicial robes should decide what is best for her. My choices as a woman are not necessarily the ones another woman would take, and while among female friends we might discuss what we do, that is not to say we presume to tell other women what to do with their bodies.
And yes, I am Catholic and I am a registered Republican. My views are my business, but I do not feel any of us have the right to tell other women what to do unless they are abusing a privilege.
Perhaps I would not have a feeling on this if I were not a breast cancer survivor. But I am. And as a survivor of not yet a year I can tell you sometimes it bugs me when non-medical professionals who are not of my inner circle or family presume too far in telling me what to do. It’s a walk a mile in my bra kind of thing. Don’t play politics of the uterus – which incidentally did not work so well for monster charity Susan G. Komen recently, did it?
As a woman, it is hard to get the medical treatment you want at times, even with health insurance. I think that politically driven legislation like HB 1077 in the PA House is dangerous to women’s health initiatives overall. Already there is enough we can’t get coverage for on a regular basis as a woman.
Not all women are meant to be mothers. Not all women can afford to be mothers. Life and medical issues precluded me from being able to bear children. Yet I do not feel as a woman I have the right to judge other women in this area. Unless of course they treat their kids like litters of stray kittens dumped in a box on the side of the road. Then I might have something to say just because as someone unable to have their own children I am astounded when women do not recognize how lucky they were to be able to choose to become a parent.
Anyway, the furor over HB 1077 grows. Bills like this reduce all women to being mindless brood mares. It is also because of legislation like this that yes, movements like Unite Against The War on Women and We Are Women March- PA (and other states) are growing. Much like the protests of the 1960s and 1970s, I feel these protests are going to be monsters. And are they all wrong?
Any discussion, here? I am irked that as someone who needs routine ultrasounds of all kinds that I have to jump through AMAZING hoops for approvals and proper codes with health insurance, yet a politically driven bill like this means that women who might not CHOOSE to have an ultrasound will get one whether they want one or not!
The primary sponsor of this bill is ironically a woman. Kathy L. Rapp.
Here are the rest of the sponsors:
INTRODUCED BY RAPP, KULA, TURZAI, STERN, DENLINGER, CUTLER,
ADOLPH, AUMENT, BAKER, BARBIN, BARRAR, BEAR, BENNINGHOFF,
BLOOM, BOBACK, BOYD, BROOKS, R. BROWN, CALTAGIRONE, CAUSER,
CHRISTIANA, CLYMER, COX, CREIGHTON, DAY, DiGIROLAMO, DUNBAR,
ELLIS, EMRICK, EVANKOVICH, J. EVANS, EVERETT, FLECK, GABLER,
GEIST, GIBBONS, GILLEN, GILLESPIE, GINGRICH, GODSHALL, GRELL,
GROVE, HACKETT, HAHN, HARHART, HARKINS, HARRIS, HEFFLEY,
HELM, HENNESSEY, HESS, HICKERNELL, HORNAMAN, HUTCHINSON,
KAUFFMAN, KAVULICH, F. KELLER, KILLION, KNOWLES, KOTIK,
KRIEGER, LAWRENCE, LONGIETTI, MAHONEY, MAJOR, MALONEY,
MARSHALL, MARSICO, MASSER, METCALFE, METZGAR, MICCARELLI,
MICOZZIE, MILLARD, MOUL, MURT, MUSTIO, OBERLANDER, PAYNE,
PEIFER, PERRY, PICKETT, PYLE, QUIGLEY, READSHAW, REED, REESE,
REICHLEY, ROAE, ROCK, SACCONE, SANTONI, SAYLOR, SCAVELLO,
CULVER, SCHRODER, SIMMONS, K. SMITH, S. H. SMITH, SONNEY,
STEVENSON, SWANGER, TALLMAN, TAYLOR, THOMAS, TOBASH, TOEPEL,
TOOHIL, TRUITT, VEREB, VULAKOVICH AND WATSON
Adolph is Delaware County and serves part of Radnor Township. Truitt is Chester County. Lawrence is Chester County. Schroder is Chester County. Hennessy is Chester County. Barrar is Chester County. Kllion is Chester County.
Dan Truitt has two websites I found. One for campaign and one for “state-related” matters. John Lawrences also has two websites. The campaign website where he tells you how he will fight for affordable healthcare and his state spot. Check out the rest of the Chesco kids on this helpful page called Chester County PA Legislators.
I found a website called Chester County Politics which may have some politician info on it – haven’t delved into it, did not know it existed until today.
chester county: show the love for your classic towns
Right now you can enter this totally fun photo contest with some fun cash prizes and the chance to be part of a traveling photography exhibition. Yes, the “I Love Classic Towns” photo contest. Put on by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission
Even I have entered. Show your town spirit in Chester County and enter some photos having to do with the Classic Towns of Kennett Square, West Chester, and Phoenixville. What do you have to lose? It’s fun.
Check out the RULES and PRIZES:
What happens if you win? Lots of good stuff…even if you don’t win.
All photos have the opportunity to be included as part of a traveling exhibition that will tour select Classic Towns. Plus, there’s the chance that your photo will be used on Classic Town’s website, in one of its publications, or in the publications of DVRPC. If that happens, you’ll receive credit as photographer and can tell your friends, families, and coworkers that you’ve been published.
Let’s talk prizes.
Our judges will award one prize in each of the seven categories — community, local history, parks and recreation, seasonal, people, main street, and residential. They will also award a Judges’ Choice Award (Best of Show) worth $500. A $300 Viewer’s Choice Award is also up for grabs. The total value for prizes is $1,500 and breaks down like this:
$500 Judges Choice (overall) $300 Voter’s Choice (overall) $100 Best Community $100 Best Local History $100 Best Main Street $100 Best Parks & Recreation $100 Best People $100 Best Residential $100 Best Seasonal
Winners will be notified beginning July 15, 2012 via the preferred contact method and must respond within 7 days. Should the winner not respond, the award will go to the runner up per category. We will announce final winners no later than July 31, 2012. We ask that winners keep their success confidential until a formal announcement is made. Failure to do so will result in a forfeit of prizes…..
Contest Rules and Restrictions DVRPC’s I Love Classic Towns Photo Contest runs from February 13, 2012 through July 31, 2012 with deadlines for Photo Submission (April 14, 2012), Public Voting (April 15, 2012 – May 14, 2012), and Formal Judging (May 15, 2012 – July 15, 2012).
All submissions must be made at contest.classictowns.org using a valid email address. There is no limit to the number of photos entered per person or the number of photos one person may enter into a category. Photos must be of one of the Classic Towns of Greater Philadelphia and taken on or after January 1, 2010. Photographers do not need to be residents of any of the Classic Towns to enter the contest. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE
West Chester and Phoenixville? Whatcha’ waiting for? Especially Phoenixville since it faces the threat of big ugly billboards. People need to see what Phoenixville is all about in my humble opinion.
Chester County should represent here, so I hope some of you photogs in Chester County enter.
it’s a billboard thing.
Billlboards are just ugly and I find the digital ones very distracting and constantly question if they are actually safe.
I was a passenger in a car on 202 on Saturday and was astounded by the new billboards being erected in or around Westtown on 202. GIANT billboards that were like GIANT flat screen televisions. I could not believe any municipality would think they were safe on an accident prone road like Route 202.
The photos were taken with my camera phone so they are fuzzy, but I think you get the picture, literally. This was how bright they were during daylight hours.
Seriously, I can’t understand how any municipality in Chester County thinks these are a positive addition to any community, can you?
Here is the article from the billboard hearing wrap-up in Haverford Township. If you are in Phoenixville of any other community facing the prospects of billboards in your community, I suggest you read the article and check these billboards out live on Route 202.
Haverford zoning board hears final billboard arguments By LOIS PUGLIONESI Times Correspondent
Published: Monday, February 06, 2012
…..The proposed locations for the five, double-faced, 672-square-foot signs are 2040, 1330 and 1157 West Chester Pike, and 600 and 648 Lancaster Ave.
A decision will be issued Feb. 16, Chairman Robert Kane said, with a written opinion to follow.
Testimony spanned two years and nine months in 26 hearings
BIG attorney Marc Kaplin repeated his argument that Haverford’s sign ordinances improperly exclude billboards, a legitimate use. The township has the right to regulate but not prohibit these signs, Kaplin said. ….Township attorney Jim Byrne maintained that BIG’s validity challenge concerned the township’s alleged prohibition on outdoor advertising, with billboards comprising one form. Haverford allows alternate outdoor advertising forms, such as ads on bus shelter, shopping cart, and stadiums, Byrne said.
He averred that Haverford’s billboard exclusion is justified based on public health, safety and welfare concerns.
He noted to a recent calamity in which a seven-story billboard collapsed onto the Brooklyn Queens Expressway in New York.
And these gigantic signs are inherently intended to create driver distraction, Byrne said, undesirable in busy, congested areas witnesses have identified as already taxing for motorists.
Byrne cited the Pennsylvania Constitution, affording everyone the right to “clean air, pure water, preservation of natural, scenic, historic and aesthetic values of the environment.” (READ MORE HERE)
Also, a cross-post from the Save Ardmore blog:
Hmmm. Whaddya know? The court says the Five Points Billboard in Bryn Mawr is not
allowed?
This news comes from Lower Merion Commissioner this afternoon. To billboard activists I am sure this is both poignant and welcome news on the night of the last scheduled billboard hearing in Haverford Township. (as per WG Hills Mom it is at 7 pm today 2/2/2012 at Haverford Twp Bldg, 2325 Darby Rd, Havertown.)
Anyway, not to keep you in suspense, but here is (verbatim) the update on the Bryn Mawr Five Points Billboard as per Comissioner Scott Zelov:
Dear Bryn Mawr Neighbors,
The Court has just today confirmed that the existing billboard in Bryn Mawr at the 5 points intersection is not allowed! It’s been awhile since the Township issued a zoning violation against the billboard attached to a wall above that intersection. After the notice was issued, the Township learned that the billboard company is the same company with whom Haverford Township and Lower Merion Township are at odds over billboards proposed for Lancaster Avenue in Bryn Mawr—and for which the closing arguments are tonight in Haverford Township! Over a year ago the Lower Merion Zoning Board found that the existing billboard had to be removed. The decision was appealed, and this morning the Common Pleas Court denied the appeal and upheld the decision of the Lower Merion Zoning Board. The decision can be further appealed to the Commonwealth Court; however, thus far the Township has achieved another big victory and excellent result against a billboard that doesn’t belong in our community.
Thanks, Scott Zelov
Here’s a walk down memory lane on this particular billboard:
Main Line Times > News Billboard debate shifts to Five Points Published: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 By Cheryl Allison
