the east whiteland data center documents post.

Current Beast of a Plan.

In order to help residents understand how ODD the whole data center process has been in East Whiteland, I will load in documents taken off of the township website.

So back before COVID when data center stuff started being floated, it was a smaller plan. Much smaller like 78,000 square feet and it was going to have a solar field to assist self-sufficiency.

I didn’t rust that then. Why? Because the name we always hear with Green Fig the most, Charles Lyddane, was a financial services professional for decades prior to this. Research indicates he started at Xerox and moved onto financial services at Merrill Lynch and Legg Mason. Translation: that background = money driven, fees and commission driven, correct?

And then all of these Democrats think he’s wunderbar? Do they know how he ran as an endorsed Republican School Board candidate circa 2013? Allow me to quote and old Patch almost press release post as in not a regular article:

https://patch.com/pennsylvania/malvern/bp–charles-lyddane-endorsed-for-school-board

Charles Lyddane endorsed for School Board
EastWhitelandGOP,Neighbor

Posted Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:50 pm ET
Updated Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:20 pm ET

Local Republican Committees Jointly Endorse GVSD School Board Candidate Charles Lyddane

Great Valley – On March 9, 2013 Republican committee people representing Republican voters living in Great Valley’s School Board Region II (parts of Republican Areas 9 and 10) endorsed Charlie Lyddane for School Board…After an open process soliciting community input and prominently posting a notice in Malvern Patch seeking interested and qualified candidates for Great Valley School Board, the committee representing Republican voters in Region II met the candidates and caucused, endorsing Charlie Lyddane by a two -thirds vote.

 According to Bill Tickner, Committee member and Willistown community leader, “Charlie Lyddane is the businessman we need to represent the Great Valley School community on the School Board. I am proud and pleased that Charlie a pro-education Great Valley parent with a strong background in finance and business development has stepped up to put those skills to work on our behalf. We need someone like Charlie who’s willing to steward scarce taxpayer resources into classroom education first..Mr. Lyddane has lived in Great Valley School District for 15 years and has graduated two children from the District. A graduate of Union College in Schenectady, NY, Mr. Lyddane has a BA in History and also attended the Business School at Union. He started his career at Xerox. He was Vice President of Merrill Lynch and Legg Mason in West Chester for 23 years. As a real estate developer and investor in Chester County for the past 9 years, Mr. Lyddane has significant experience in budget development and implementation, as well as achieving strategic goals in a timely and cost efficient manner. He also has significant experience in Property Management.

 According to Mr. Lyddane, “When you are managing shareholder’s money, you must produce a product that is beneficial to those shareholders. 

Boom there it is – “you must produce a product that is beneficial to those shareholders.”

That tells you what you need to know, doesn’t it? It’s not about community, or the environment or anything altruistic, just good old fashioned green backs right?

Before I go back to the data center of it all, one more article from his life before Green Fig which makes you wonder is this just like another stock pick? Is this why all of the back and forth?

https://www.wealthmanagement.com/wealth-management-industry-trends/acting-on-his-own

Acting on His Own
Some brokers almost cringe at the term “stock-picker.” It can conjure up visions of reps with frayed nerves and churned accounts.Not Charlie Lyddane.”I’m not ashamed to admit that I pick stocks,” says Lyddane, a soloist at Legg Mason in West Chester, Pa. “It’s what a broker is supposed to do. My clients like that kind of help.”Apparently so. Lyddane reports $1 million in production and $120 million

Charlie Lyddane
December 1, 2000

…Some brokers almost cringe at the term “stock-picker.” It can conjure up visions of reps with frayed nerves and churned accounts.

Not Charlie Lyddane.

“I’m not ashamed to admit that I pick stocks,” says Lyddane, a soloist at Legg Mason in West Chester, Pa. “It’s what a broker is supposed to do. My clients like that kind of help.”…Apparently so. Lyddane reports $1 million in production and $120 million under management. He’s been a broker for 19 years and has never been part of a team.

“I’ve never had the opportunity to have or need a partnership,” Lyddane says. “Besides, I like doing things on my own. No one will care about my clients like I do.”

He thinks it’s wrong to hand off client service. “My clients pay to deal with me,” Lyddane says. “I craft stock portfolios of blue chips with a bent toward technology. I’m their single source, and I like being responsible.”

He is responsible – literally.

With 400 clients and 1,000 accounts, Lyddane uses discretionary account management as a time-saving technique….Although he does his own thing, Lyddane appreciates the help he gets from the firm. “Legg Mason supports a number of teams, but I’ve found them to be very supportive of what I do. I have a great arrangement.”

Anyway, the solar field idea disappeared and then they wanted these box things they called pods. Then I think those disappeared because of maybe crypto currency concerns?

I heard a while back that PECO said something like that data center would be like the second largest site next to the City of Philadelphia and if so, how crazy is that?

Someone I know wrote today:

The Limerick Nuclear plant generates about 2300 MWH (megawatt hours) of electricity per day (with two reactors) enough for 2 million homes

The new proposed data center in town is expected to use about 100-600 MWH.

Or 8% to as much as 48% of the ENTIRE OUTPUT of a single reactor. For one data center. The equivalent of 500,000 homes.

It could actually be MORE than the energy equivalent of 500,000 homes, couldn’t it be?

We have a weak and problematic power grid already – when we have outages they will be first served (residents will get pushed down the grid) and all those diesel generators right? And then you just have to wonder HOW MANY TIMES IS EAST WHITELAND GOING TO LET THIS GUY TRY TO TWEAK A PLAN THAT ALWAYS SEEMS TO HAVE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES WHICH MEANS WHY NOT AN ENTIRE NEW SUBMISSION?

When the Philadelphia Inquirer wrote an article about this in 2023, I was interviewed. What I said was:

I’m not against responsible development, But when you’re talking about new kinds of technology and new kinds of factories, basically, you need the most updated [municipal] codes available, and our current codes are out of date…We don’t want to repeat the mistakes of the past.

The past I was in part thinking of is the lithium contamination etc. that was Foote Mineral. Foote was an EPA site. There was a review of the site in 2024, but well, the whole data center of it all wasn’t supposed to be that ginormous yet was it?

https://semspub.epa.gov/work/03/2399721.pdf

To quote the 2024 site review:

After ceasing operations in 1991, the Site owner at the time, Cyprus Foote Mineral Company, arranged for the removal of equipment and for demolition of remaining buildings down to their foundations. In 1998, Frazer Exton Development, LP (FED) purchased the original Property (Parcel 42-3-130) and assumed responsibility for cleaning up the Site. FED also installed a single cap over both the North Quarry and South Quarry as part of cleanup activities. In December 2016, Whiteland Holdings, LP (WH), the holder of the first mortgage on the Property, foreclosed and acquired the Property from FED. In a deed recorded on August 15, 2019, WH sold parcel 42-3-130.2 to Green Fig Land LLC, and on January 31, 2022, WH sold parcel 42-3-130 to Green Fig 11.33 LLC2. At the time of this FYR’s October 2023 Site inspection, the 42-3-130 and 42-3-130.2 parcel owner had, on several occasions, permitted a local electric company to use some uncapped areas of the Site as a laydown space to store lumber. The area is not in constant use. The current 42-3-130 and 42-3-130.2 parcel owner intends to redevelop parcel 42-3-130.2 as the location for a data farm facility. In 2024, construction activities for the data farm facility were initiated on parcel 42-3-130.2.

(2For clarity purposes, Green Fig Land LLC and Green Fig 11.33 LLC are owned by the same individual.)

https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0301103

October 2022
January 2023

https://www.inquirer.com/real-estate/commercial/data-centers-proposed-suburban-chester-county-pennsylvania-20230119.html

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/1547-csr-planning-2-million-sq-ft-150mw-campus-outside-philadelphia-pennsylvania

https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/southeastern-pa/data-center-company-to-develop-up-to-2m-square-feet-of-space-in-chester-county/article_46cf3574-2932-11ed-ac4d-ebeb3896d54e.html

https://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/news/2021/08/03/new-pa-tax-exemption-development-jobs.html

Not Everyone Is Sold on the Benefits of Amazon’s Data Center
Coming to Falls Township – August 2025

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220830005696/en/fifteenfortyseven-Critical-Systems-Realty-Adds-over-100-Acres-and-150-Megawatts-in-Pennsylvania-for-Massive-Data-Center-Expansion

https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7080

And of course there is a sneaky bill getting fast tracked through Harrisburg as we speak. HB5121. If you google it before reading it, benignly it is described as “which aims to assist Pennsylvania municipalities in regulating data centers through a model zoning ordinance.”

BULLSHIT. This is that thing they talked about in 2025 that would remove rights from municipalities rendering them helpless in certain zoning situation. It does a band aid slither into the municipalities planning code so there is zoning on data centers. Data Centers can pop up anywhere. It arrives just in time for the Governor to announce his re-election bid. Essentially Johnny Frackenstein (AKA Governor Josh Shapiro) wants to remove local control for communities to reject this. State run and controlled everything and aren’t we experiencing enough of that at present in Washington DC in general? This is a bad bill that has data center developers and operators all wet at the prospect (sorry, yes that’s gross but true.)

Anyway, it’s up to people to turn out in East Whiteland until this thing is for the people and not at the expense of the people. And if you care, look up who is on HB 5121 and give them a ringy dingy and say WTF (just politely.)

https://www.palegis.us/legislation/bills/2025/hb2151

Here’s the hot mess of East Whiteland. Obviously not everything, but enough to make your head spin:

(How do you have an acoustic study when something is not live in an area? Is it like those traffic studies which are you get what you pay for?)

east whiteland needs to say NO to supersizing/upsizing the data center still being constructed!

This is a Ginny Kerslake photo, originally.

Let’s be clear about the data center here. What was originally approved and allowed by East Whiteland you’re not going to cancel that BUT given the size and the expansion they want to do on something that is not yet open and proves it needs. It is like a whole other plan and shoukd be treated as such, right??

Now the data center developer wants to upgrade some technology and move some stuff around. If that is hypothetically beneficial to his plan and would be beneficial to the residents that’s one thing but that does NOT mean the developer should just get a gimme supersizing prize of a half built project not up and running, does it?

And I hear that East Whiteland is putting a live stream on for this very heated topic. Their reticence with that is they don’t want to be hacked again (happened with Zoom) and have to see porn but you know what? how many other municipalities still do Zoom every week? Maybe their Internet safety protocol isn’t strong enough? The planning commission is but the opening salvo here.

Anyway as per East Whiteland’s website:

The Applicant for the proposed Data Center on Swedesford Road will attend the upcoming Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, January 28, 2026 at 7:00pm (Livestream Available via Link Below)

The Applicant for the proposed Data Center on Swedesford Road will attend the upcoming Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, January 28, 2026 at 7:00pm to present an Amended Plan for the project. In addition to in-person attendance, the meeting will be available to Livestream via the Township Website using the link below. Public comment may be submitted via email to bcarosello@eastwhiteland.org. Please submit comments by 4:00pm on Wednesday.

LIVE STREAM

People need to make sure that they tell every single supervisor and Township staff (politely) if they don’t want this. And they can’t just do it on social media. You have to zoom into the meetings, go to the meetings, send emails. Call media you know to cover it. Residents and those concerned need to make the time, not excuses.

If residents had paid more attention around 2022 when this whole thing was going through initial approval process, maybe we wouldn’t be here today but we will never know as that ship sailed. What hasn’t sailed is the developer does not have the Divine Right of Kings to make his project bigger, does he? That wasn’t what was approved, and it has to go through a whole new planning process from top to the bottom or it should right? I mean a 629,830 square foot increase is not smidge larger is it? “1,026,800 s.f. to 1,656,630 s.f. (along with related increases in building coverage and impervious coverage)” is quite a bit larger, yes?

And people from East Whiteland are contacting East Whiteland about the 55+ development that was approved years ago unavoidably in West Whiteland. Again, that ship sailed. I told people here and people told people other places about all those meetings, and the residents did not pay attention. And the problem with that project is under the Municipalities Planning Code so it was approved. And until that weighty outdated tome in Harrisburg is comprehensively updated to protect our communities, they are going to be targeted by developers for whatever is going to make them the most money in that minute and that is the truth isn’t it?

Also to be noted is there are many many West Whiteland residents who are concerned about the potential supersizing of this data center. They had to deal with this developer when he wanted to put a hydrogen hub right next to their park right in the same area. And that didn’t happen because the residents and supervisors stood up and took action.

In my humble opinion, the supervisors in East Whiteland need to be on the same page as the residents when it comes to data centers. If that developer wants to improve technology, that is mutually beneficial to all or tweak design on plan size approved, that is one thing, and it’s something they should want to do for their bottom line in the future, right? But we are already seeing changes in our power grid from data centers. We run the risk of having well water polluted by these data centers. There are other ways it is harmful to the environment and then there is the sheer noise. So East Whiteland approved a data center and it’s not up and running yet so there is no actual proof that is supersizing is needed at this juncture, is there? It is a developer want, it is not a developer need in my opinion and I’m allowed to have that.

I also of the opinion that we cannot depend on the planning commission to say no to this. I don’t think they have the knowledge necessary to do anything other than pass it along with a rubber stamp. In my opinion, I think they are all going to say unless people turn out and protest that “oh it’s OK. It’s better for people. It’ll bring lots of business and tax revenue” or whatever platitudes get blown up people’s rear ends and there’s no proof that it will do any of those things, but that’s what they’re told isn’t it?

This is who is on the planning commission:

Deborah Abel, Chair
Todd Asousa, Vice Chair
Bob Logan
Bill Wrabley
John Laumer
Tim Kelly
Jaime Damiani

Go to https://www.eastwhiteland.org/ for more information on this project and for telephone numbers and email addresses, etc.

https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/columbus/report-links-data-center-to-rare-cancers-raising-questions-about-central-ohioans-safety

This was a superfund site – EPA- Foote Mineral. The planning commission should know that you can’t just come in with a resubmission like this- it has to start the clock again with a resubmission- where is the impact study? What is the complete feasibility? Planning needs to restart the clock if the developer wishes to expand, isn’t that a truism? Who inspects? Who is the monitoring agency? So many variables.

As Ginny Kerslake said TWO days ago:

I just saw this photo (minus the X) posted elsewhere. I feel compelled to address it because it’s the kind of messaging that is counterproductive to protecting our communities and the environment.

It’s the kind of messaging we get from some politicians talking out both sides of their mouth, and from the industry itself, giving false assurance that they won’t pollute or deplete our resources because there are strict environmental regulations in place.

It’s false.

We don’t HAVE anywhere close to adequate rules in place to protect our air and water from this buildout of AI data centers and power plants to fuel them – not to mention protect climate and communities.

Workers? These hyper scale data centers create very few jobs once built – and the intent is to eliminate workers.

And we have a Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection that has a history of turning a blind eye to violations by certain industries. And it’s led by a Secretary who has been engaged in backroom dealmaking with these corporations and has promised to deliver Amazon with the “highest level of service, accountability and urgency to meet their project needs”. (See letter in comments obtained through a RTK request.

Let’s not pretend the situation in Pennsylvania is anything different.

And what Ginny said was similarly said by a dear friend today who keeps asking Harrisburg WHO is responsible for watching Data Centers? WHO is the monitoring agency? I mean those who live with the PA DEPs inconsistency in their communities know this is a problem. WHO watches and who watchdogs the entities who are supposed to watch?

Also from Ginny:

Oh, and my opinions are bought to me by the First Amendment. They haven’t repealed that yet as far as I know.

Other things I found:

https://law.justia.com/cases/pennsylvania/superior-court/2024/968-eda-2023.html

From the other day:

meeting alerts: green fig wants to make east whiteland data center being built BIGGER!

This is a Ginny Kerslake photo originally

Ok residents, the weekend surprise is essentially the data center developer building in East Whiteland wants to make it BIGGER.

We have a proverbial foot in the door scenario, and IMHO East Whiteland never should have allowed the foot to get there in the first place and I am allowed to have this opinion under the First Amendment.

To QUOTE the township:

📌The Applicant for the proposed Data Center on Swedesford Road will attend the upcoming Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, January 28, 2026 to present an Amended Plan for the project. The Amended Plan differs from the Previously Approved Plan as follows:

  • total building square footage has increased from 1,026,800 s.f. to 1,656,630 s.f. (along with related increases in building coverage and impervious coverage)
  • cooling equipment has been redesigned and relocated from the ground immediately adjacent to the buildings (water-consuming cooling towers) to the rooftop (waterless rooftop chillers) along with corresponding sound mitigation barriers
  • emergency back-up generators have been relocated from the basement of the buildings to the ground immediately adjacent to the buildings along with corresponding sound mitigation barriers
  • office uses and loading facilities have been relocated from the southern side of the buildings to the northern side of the buildings facing Swedesford Road
  • additional trees and landscaping have been proposed on the former sewer lagoons located between the development site and Swedesford Road
  • design and location of stormwater management facilities, parking lots, and internal circulation areas have been modified
  • previously proposed microwave towers, antenna yards, and ground-mounted cooling towers have been removed

The Amended Plans can be found on the Subdivision & Land Development Applications page of the Township Website (refer to 2025-08-ALD Green Fig).📌

East Whiteland Township needs to say NO and they need to enable Zoom capability for ALL meetings where this is concerned given the weather and number of residents and neighbors who will be interested.

Again… the weekend surprise is essentially the data center developer for the East Whiteland Data Center on Swedesford next to West Whiteland park land, wants to make it BIGGER.

East Whiteland Township needs to say NO and they need to enable Zoom capability for ALL meetings where this is concerned given the weather and number of residents and neighbors who will be interested.

When we (myself and others) posted about this data center first happening a few years ago, very few people were interested. It was the chorus of crickets.

Recently, some people seemed like they were interested in this again and people wondered where they were a couple of years ago. This is the same developer that West Whiteland turned down for the hydrogen plant.

Once upon a time, I think this developer was like a stock broker or a money manager, but then he saw the dollar signs here didn’t he? So that’s fine if this is his chosen career path, but he shouldn’t detrimentally affect residents in multiple municipalities should he?

I make no secret of the fact that I always thought this was too big a plan for Swedesford Road. And at the time I couldn’t believe the people in developments across the road didn’t seem bothered by this.

Here are some interesting comments so far:

If you Google the project, here’s what comes up (in part):

Key Project Details

  • Location: 760 Swedesford Road, Malvern, Chester County, Pennsylvania.
  • Capacity: Planned for 290 MW of power, with significant capacity for 2 million square feet of development.
  • Partnership: A joint venture between Green Fig Land Company and 1547 Critical Systems Realty.
  • lol Features: Designed for hyperscale users with potential rooftop solar (up to 7 MW) and high-density, interconnected capabilities. 

Sorry, not sorry but residents and residents of neighboring municipalities had better wake up this time around.

The bell on the original data center being built, can’t be on wrong, but residents should have a say and be able to say no to making it bigger.

https://www.facebook.com/share/1BytbBQCvU/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Google Louden County, Virginia and check out Ginny Kerslake’s Facebook page about her recent visit to Louden County, Virginia.

https://cms2.revize.com/revize/eastwhitelandtownshippa/Documents/Government/Departments/Planning%20And%20Development/Land%20Developments%20Applications/2025/Amended%20Waiver%20Request%20Letter.pdf?t=202512081126160&t=202512081126160

https://cms2.revize.com/revize/eastwhitelandtownshippa/Documents/Government/Departments/Planning%20And%20Development/Land%20Developments%20Applications/2025/Acoustic%20Study%20Report.pdf?t=202512081123450&t=202512081123450

https://cms2.revize.com/revize/eastwhitelandtownshippa/Documents/Government/Departments/Planning%20And%20Development/Land%20Developments%20Applications/2025/Data%20Centers%20LD%20Plans.pdf?t=202512081127020&t=202512081127020

https://cms2.revize.com/revize/eastwhitelandtownshippa/Documents/Government/Departments/Planning%20And%20Development/Land%20Developments%20Applications/2025/Amended%20Project%20Narrative.pdf?t=202512081125330&t=202512081125330

Address: 209 Conestoga Road Frazer, Pa. 19355
Phone: 610-648-0600

Here are email addresses if you wish to contact East Whiteland and ask them to enable Zoom for all meetings where this will be discussed:

bcarosello@eastwhiteland.org

sbrown@eastwhiteland.org

pfixler@eastwhiteland.org

slambert@eastwhiteland.org

csmith@eastwhiteland.org

https://www.eastwhiteland.org/news_detail_T2_R136.php

Old articles and other links:

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/1547-csr-planning-2-million-sq-ft-150mw-campus-outside-philadelphia-pennsylvania/

https://baxtel.com/data-center/1547-chester-county-pa

https://www.commercialsearch.com/news/2-msf-philly-data-center-project-moves-forward/

Excerpt from 2024:

A neighboring site offers an additional 5 million square feet of development potential.

fifteenfortyseven Critical Systems Realty and Green Fig Land Co. have unveiled the latest advancements at their 100-acre hyperscale data center developmentoutside Philadelphia that could eventually comprise up to 2 million square feet of space. Lease options are now available for build-to-suit, powered shell and turnkey data center space.

Located about 20 miles northwest of Philadelphia in East Whiteland Township, Pa., the site was acquired by GFLC and 1547 in 2022. The development firm had previously received the local authorities’ approval to construct two data centers of about 1 million square feet each. An adjacent property is available for the development of data center buildings totaling up to 5 million square feet.

https://vista.today/2024/01/data-center-in-chester-county/

https://www.inquirer.com/real-estate/commercial/data-centers-proposed-suburban-chester-county-pennsylvania-20230119.html

https://baxtel.com/data-center/1547-chester-county-pa

https://www.lightwaveonline.com/data-center/article/14282043/fifteenfortyseven-green-fig-land-co-partner-for-new-pennsylvania-data-center-campus

(Articles may have pay walls, if so not my job to unlock them, sorry)