So I wrote a post yesterday on how I feel about some of the politics in this country. Wow, the brew ha ha which has ensued one would have thought I was chicken little and the sky was falling in.
It actually made me ask a question:
So if you don’t like tea partiers and question them and other political extremists, does that make you a bad Republican? Or a bad Democrat for that matter? If we can’t question politics are we truly free?
Why can’t I question what makes me uncomfortable along with what I do not understand? Why does that suddenly make me a political undesirable? As a woman am I supposed to walk ten steps behing, be barefoot, pregnant, in the kitchen and MUTE?
Let’s review something – I blog for me first and foremost. I share my opinions because it is what I feel like writing about in that moment. It is not always going to be placid and necessarily comfortable for all. It’s not always going to be a pretty photo, or a fantastic recipe to share. Sometimes it will be topics like politics, from a local stage to a national level. It depends where the inspiration comes from at that moment.
I feel that the basic framework on which this country was founded is exactly why we should question things now. I feel that in an odd way certain groups in this country are trying to suppress some of the very freedoms and philosophies on which this nation was founded and grew.
That, dear readers, doesn’t make me a bad female Republican. It means I think about things.
I was a volunteer, a media relations volunteer at RNC2000. Twelve years ago I felt strongly enough about being a part of that to seek out friends in Washington who could help me get a better volunteer position. Truthfully, I was one of the few volunteering in my capacity that did not come out of politically connected PR and advertising shops.
I approached it all with an open mind and as a result, met some truly remarkable people. And I lent a Congressman at the time named Chip Pickering cab fare when he got off a train without his wallet and no one else believed he was who he was. (And yes he paid me back and my reward were invitations to some pretty awesome A list parties.) But what I noticed was at that time the Republican party worked really hard to extremists on the fringe so everyone felt honestly welcome within the party. Not so any longer. The extremists are being embraced at the expense of ordinary Americans in the middle. That is an act of desperation that I feel quite strongly will bite them in the rear.
Both political parties are guilty of the dumbing down of America and that bothers me. Washington is full of politicians spending our tax dollars to prove each side right and wrong. These politicians aren’t worried so much about the constituencies they represent, but seem to be constantly running for re-election. I think that is crap.
Truthfully, I have been reading up on things in Washington, and I think Democrats and their assorted pals are nervous about the upcoming election. I believe people should start paying attention to who is leaving what and taking what new job. Because face it, with a new administration a lot of people could find themselves on the outside looking in.
One example I see recently and locally to an extent is the latest headmaster appointed at The Haverford School. John A. Nagl. His experience and current responsibilities are truly remarkable. But a change of course to headmaster of the Haverford School? To me that might be commentary on the current political climate and fear of things to come. (of course what a lot of people are also asking is why Haverford is choosing yet another ex military to run a non-military school?)
Ok, so back to the topic at hand: questioning politics.
If we can’t question and discuss politics, let alone express our feelings as to what is bothering us, we are no longer truly free.
You can’t just drink the kool-aid in either political party and it would behoove more people to look at who they are voting for a little more closely. It would also behoove more to be of an independent mind.
And if you want to discuss with me what I am thinking about, that is fine, but don’t just tell me I am across the board wrong. I know I am not. Maybe I make some of you uncomfortable with my pondering, and I am sorry. But you have to think. You can’t just act like a Stepford wife or Moonie and pull the lever for any candidate. You need to ponder. You have to ponder. You have as a resident of the United States of America an obligation to carefully ponder as far as I am concerned.
Here are a couple of notes I received from people I know with regard to my blog post yesterday:
I LONG for moderate Republicans to take back their party from the crazies. Leave women’s bodies alone and focus on the types of spending reform for which the party is supposed to stand.
What makes me crazy is how many have signed a PLEDGE that makes them beholden to a LOBBYIST. They sold out their ability to compromise and act in the best interest of our country because Grover Norquist made them do it. To me, that is treason. When a leader like Mitch McConnell says that Congress’ goal for two years should be to unseat the President in the next election, ergo not pass any legislation that would seem like a “win” for the D side, regardless of how much it would benefit people and businesses that are hurting, where are we?
Stop worrying about who people are schtupping. Stop worrying about women who take a pill so that they have two children instead of 20, and pass the existing legislation that lowers corporate tax rates, invests in retraining for people in hard-hit areas that have been laid off. Stop blindly protecting the defense budget and question why we’re spending hundreds of millions of dollars building up bases in the Caribbean to combat drugs.
Someone…please…take back the reins. When Reagan’s key tax policy advisor has said that the GOP has gone off the rails and is hurting the country, there’s a problem. I think we need a more-than-two-party system. But, at the very least, we need TWO functional parties that welcome debate and dissent, can compromise, and don’t accuse anyone who disagrees with them as being “un-American.”
Another one (ironically from a friend in DC who reads Philadelphia Inquirer columnist Karen Heller):
And please be sure to read the sentence where Smith says to put yourself in the father’s position. Yeah, the father’s position is MUCH more difficult to be in than the poor girl who got raped and pregnant.
“Maybe Tom Smith just wanted us to remember his name. Or realize he’s the Pennsylvania Republican running for the U.S. Senate.
Or perhaps he’s jealous of headline-hogging Todd Akin, that Missouri master of creative obstetrics, and wanted his own moment in the sun and on this paper’s front page.
In any event, Smith finally made news Monday by comparing unintended pregnancy to rape.
Specifically, his daughter’s unintended pregnancy to rape, after a Harrisburg press luncheon in front of a group of reporters….
Smith answered, “I lived something similar to that with my own family. She chose life, and I commend her for that. She knew my views. But fortunately for me, I didn’t have to. . . . She chose the way I thought. Don’t get me wrong; it wasn’t rape.”
Scolforo: “Similar how?”
Smith: “Having a baby out of wedlock.
Scolforo: “That is similar to rape?”
Smith: “No, no, no. Well, put yourself in a father’s position. Yes, I mean it is similar.” “
The last comment is from someone who was a life long Republican until not so long ago:
I have been enjoying newsroom all along – despite the nasty reviews from the “pros.”I also found Sunday night’s show to be spot on.So who owns the term rino these days? I sure as heck can’t say. That we are even asking that question is just plain sad.For me, long ago my personal experiences informed my decision to leave a party that so deliberately and decidedly was extremely comfortable with treating women as second class citizens. But the fact that the Republican party is now, in 2012, hell-bent on controlling women’s bodies in ways I really never dreamed could happen in my lifetime makes it impossible for me to contemplate ever returning. And please, how is it that creationism is even a topic we have to contemplate – let alone discuss in the public discourse?But these are only the most obvious of issues. what is deeply, deeply disturbing to me is the lack of caring and compassion for those in need. Not every person is a lazy worthless free loader living off/on the public dole, and the insanity – to say nothing of the fundamental selfishness – which seems to be at the center of policies that so callously and inappropriately ignore those less fortunate, I just can not understand or grasp such perspectives.So there – I joined you on the soap box…..thanks for listening.