great valley school district gives permission to indoctrinate your kids.

Let the not so subtley veiled attempts at indoctrination begin – the failed political types want to “train” your kids and isn’t that special? If you have a problem with this contact:

hcapetola@gvsd.org

dgoffredo@gvsd.org

jwexler@gvsd.org

sotoole@gvsd.org

dkasper@gvsd.org

I think in the unpleasant political environment of this country at present, I find it foolhardy for this to be a school sanctioned activity. I would love to know why a health and physical ed teacher is doing this? Will this be monitored?

Using the word “train” has very unpleasant implications. It’s very 1930s Germany of Great Valley School District isn’t it?

Dustin Kasper is the advisor. Why are they meeting in a weight room? I mean, I get that he’s a health and physical teacher. What are they going do sets in between the indoctrination sessions? Kasper went to West Chester University with graduate work at Immaculata. He also apparently served in the military unsure of what branch. He’s also listed as a Realtor at Keller Williams.

So is somebody else leading this group? Or is it an essence led by the faculty advisor?? Sorry I don’t know I’m asking because when I was in high school I did sports and I was on the student newspaper. I never had a desire to be an Alex P. Keaton. I also belong to a service club and we used to do things like beautification projects around the community.

I think if this was just a high school Republican club or a high school Democrat club I wouldn’t care. It’s that other component and I don’t know Turning Point is not my jam and it has a religious component and if this is supposed to model that this is a public school and how does that work?

I have no problem with the restoration of a veterans memorial but where is this veterans memorial? But a weightlifting competition for a pseudo religious political organization? Isn’t that a little odd?

I just think it sounds a little vague. And it’s powered by a group that I don’t really believe promotes good as much as it promotes assimilation, but those aren’t mutually exclusive.

Whatever. The parents who are of a certain political bent will be delighted. I wonder if they will all have cute little uniforms?

hey chesco dems, was grandma not saying please?

I received some very interesting text messages this afternoon. And for those who will try to figure out who it is, it’s a reliable source and it’s not in my usual cadre of contacts.

I forgot all about the Chester County Democrats endorsement convention or whatever the heck they call it. Under the current leadership it has turned into an engineered circus. In my not so humble opinion, utterly defeating the purpose of PRIMARIES.

Anyway it seems the kids are starting to revolt on Grandma Charlotte and some of the others given the messages also passed to me.

This. Is. VERY. INTERESTING no?

Then the next question is, after will Charlotte Valyo resign before the end of her tenure and is she going to try to run unendorsed after drubbing it into people’s heads for the last 4 years that you can’t run unendorsed when of course that is the point of a primary, yes? If she tries to run unendorsed, she needs a T-shirt that says HYPOCRITE.

Now Brian McGuinness is on West Chester Borough Council. He was also at one point in time head of the Chester County Democrats – he had replaced Michelle Vaughn who is currently Register of Wills. But he had some political scandal time circa 2014, didn’t he?

Hans is I presume referring to Hans van Mol, a fairly newly minted Tredyffrin Supervisor with seemingly endless political aspirations. He even had a little campaign for state committee video. I loved his carefully chosen photos in said video , although I don’t know if having Cherelle Parker in the mix was good but it was at least A+ for obvious right?

At one time Hans ran for State Rep, and Warren Kampf defeated him which I still find amusing for many reasons.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1KjfNtMKy2/?mibextid=wwXIfr

And newly minted Downingtown Borough Mayor, Erica Deuso, was not endorsed as well. As of 38 minutes ago however, Ms. Runs for Everything is still trying to get on the ballot for state committee… although she absurdly says something to the effect of just because you get me on the ballot, doesn’t mean you have to vote for me. (Mmkay and I am the tooth fairy.)

I’ll be honest I’m still not an Erica fan and it’s solely because she’s always running for something. It’s not about service, it’s about her. So I guess we call that political narcissism, huh?

Deuso ran unsuccessfully for Downingtown Borough Council. Then with I still believe was Charlotte Valyo’s blessing she tried to primary Danielle Otten and well?

Those who were actually endorsed in the end, I am not certain of at this point in time. I guess I am just sort of stunned that the status quo didn’t just get a hall pass. And I think that is what’s important here.

Democrats in Chester County are sending other Democrats in Chester County a message, as well as the rest of the state. So I think this is interesting and is well worth watching. I am taking this as a positive.

Of course, the next thing I’m wondering is will Charlotte finish out her term? I think it ends at some point this year, right? Or does she have other ambitions? What are the ambitions of the others not endorsed this week?

Tick tock. Politics is a dance meets a multi act play, is it not?

if you want a do nothing suck-up politician, by all means radnor re-elect state rep. lisa borowski and remember: lisa ❤️ data centers.

Oh, look there she is! It’s Lisa Borowski there for a photo op! and you can always tell when it’s election season because she gets a fresh haircut and her bangs are out of her face and she looks less like a Muppet.

Former do much of nothing Radnor Township Commissioner now State Representative Lisa Borowski likes long walks, nature, photo ops. But what does she actually do? Most people are still trying to figure that out.

She is still very much on PA HB2151 which will remove the rights of Pennsylvanians and their municipalities when it comes to AI data centers.

She was also on that last bill (HB 502) that failed miserably in 2025. So what was she promised if she was on this HB2151 and was Josh Shapiro‘s little cheerleader Muppet?

So she’s out doing her nominating petition, and is announcing events where they’re going to be signing these petitions throughout Delaware County in her district. Here are the locations and dates:

Your mission should you choose to accept it is to show up at these events as well as call her office and tell her to get off of the data center bill. The number is PA HB2151.

If that bill goes through, it will affect our power grid which affects our PECO bills. It affects our water usage. Data Centers are not environmentally friendly. data centers are also extraordinarily noisy in a very pervasive negative way.

Lisa Borowski needs a field trip to Louden County, Virginia and needs to get her head out of her ass about this issue.

If Lisa Borowski wants to be reelected, she needs to do the right thing here. If not, she deserves to not be reelected.

https://www.palegis.us/legislation/bills/2025/hb2151

Call her. Show up at her events and tell her being an elected official is more than just a series of photo ops.

You can also call her campaign number:

610-547-7537

info@lisaforpa168.com

https://www.palegis.us/legislation/bills/2025/hb2151

BE POLITE when you contact her and I know for some that’s a challenge because she seriously has annoying affectations and mannerisms.

Make it an easy thing for Lisa to understand: if she wants to stay in office, she needs to get off of bad bills like this that only helps special interests, not everyday Pennsylvanians.

PS her municipality seems eminent domain happy so you might want to ask the state representative where she stands on eminent domain as well.

oops she did it again!

Seriously, you can’t make this stuff up. Just when you think there’s no more Barsouming to be had, here she comes again! She is the Britney Spears of county government! Oops she did it again!

https://www.votebeat.org/pennsylvania/2026/02/06/chester-county-mail-ballot-application-error-reverse-first-last-names/

Mail ballot application error adds to Chester County’s woes

The county sent out thousands of forms that reversed voters’ first and last names.

By Carter Walker | February 6, 2026, 4:12pm EST

A Pennsylvania county election office that was already facing criticism for a 2025 election snafu and an alleged hostile work environment is dealing with another error. 

Roughly 145,000 mail ballot applications sent out in Chester County this week for the 2026 elections were printed with the first and last names of voters reversed…..Chester County’s election director, Karen Barsoum, confirmed ….Barsoum declined to say which employee or division of the office performed the check.

She said the accuracy check was more focused on confirming that the proper information, such as voter ID number or address, was connected to the right voter rather than whether the names were in the correct order. 

Mmmkay Karen and once again we hear crickets versus a simple apology or truly owning yet another screw-up.

Effective leadership starts at the top and she’s not a leader is she? She’s not a good manager is she?

Read the full article, there is no paywall.

#FIREKARENBARSOUM

Prior Barsouming includes:

https://www.votebeat.org/pennsylvania/2026/02/05/chester-county-pollbook-problem-2025-election-board-meeting-karen-barsoum/

https://vista.today/2024/08/karen-barsoum-leadership-chester-county/

https://www.votebeat.org/pennsylvania/2025/11/12/chester-county-pollbook-provisional-ballot-problem-2025-election/

https://www.inquirer.com/politics/election/chester-county-election-office-burnout-20251216.html

missing: state representative lisa borowski’s conscience

‼️MISSING‼️: Rep. Lisa Borowski Lisa Borowski for State Representative. We suspect she is probably on her knees somewhere doing whatever is asked of her by Johnny Frack as this is what she does- whatever she is told. (I hope the pats on the head don’t mess up her hair.)

Lisa Borowski is a co-sponsor of horrible data center loving PA HB 2151, and was for quite a while a co-sponsor of last year’s disaster of a data center bill HB 502, until she slithered away like the snake 🐍 in the grass that she is (or muppet weasel take your pick.)

This is Lisa’s habitual political M.O. —whatever is best for Lisa. She would not and cannot be counted on to defend Delco residents on pipelines, hydrogen hubs, warehouses, or wanton development (even in Radnor Township which also doesn’t like being tagged by this lowly blogher much to my great amusement!) so unless public pressure comes to bear she will sit there on data center bills like Joshie’s good little girl.

It’s time to innundate Radnor’s fave political muppet. Call her, if they don’t pick up the phone, leave a message. DO NOT USE FOUL LANGUAGE NO MATTER WHAT – among other things, her staff doesn’t deserve it. They can’t help it if she is inept and a political striver. (I had to laugh just now because for some reason when I started to write striver, it wanted it to be stripper🤣)

If you live in her district, you also should find people to primary her and run against her who are decent candidates. After all if she can’t stand up for everyday Pennsylvanians in solidarity of getting rid of data center threats, you can’t trust her for anything. People should want someone who works for them not for themselves and special interest groups right?

https://www.palegis.us/legislation/bills/2025/hb2151

STATE REP. LISA BOROWSKI
168TH DISTRICT/DELCO
CO-SPONSOR OF BAD DATA CENTER BILL
PA HB2151
LAST SEEN AT PHOTO OPS IN RADNOR TOWNSHIP
Call 484-427-2884 or
717-772-2005
1-833-787-5039

Oh, and Lisa? The First Amendment protects my right to criticize you as now a state politician because you are no better than you were as a local politician.

stealth legislation: the bill gov. shapiro and a.i. / data center bigwigs don’t want pa residents to see before it’s passed.

Shhhhh! They want it to be a political secret! Literally if you try searching for it on Google and stuff it’s nearly impossible to find you have to dig. Which is kind of unusual because they want these bills out there so people can see their elected officials are working except they elected officials know this is a shameful dirty secret and should not pass go.

The media is not really talking about this – I have only found ONE story and it goes to some sort of initial vote TOMORROW as in 2/4/26. But we all are and why is that? Is there a Johnny Frack err Josh Shapiro blackout of sorts? I hate to sound all conspiracy theory, but this whole issue is like a giant conspiracy theory, isn’t it?

It is a partisan bill. It’s a Democrat sponsored bill, the they want to offer up with us the residents of Pennsylvania as collateral damage, to help Governor Josh Shapiro, who just launched his reelection campaign and has an agenda when it comes to data centers, doesn’t he?

https://legiscan.com/PA/bill/HB2151/2025

The bill opens up by saying:

An Act amending the act of July 31, 1968 (P.L.805, No.247), known as the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, in zoning, providing for data center ordinance assistance; and imposing duties on the Center for Local Government Services.

So yes, it’s a Band-Aid on the Municipalities Planning Code (MPC) which hasn’t had any comprehensive updates since circa 1968 or 1969. The MPC guides all the zoning that we find maddening affecting our communities. The MPC is the reason that when your elected officials say they can’t do something about something getting shoved down a community’s throat…they often can’t. Sometimes it’s because they lost their balls but not all of the time, right?

You know it’s funny, but under the MPC, all of our communities have to update their comprehensive plans every so many years or they should. (In some cases, like what was once the case in Lower Merion Township for example, it was like 30 years or better, but I digress.) Anyway the MPC tells our communities how often they should update yet that weighty tome is never comprehensively updated, and it needs it, but in order to do it, it requires an act of the state constitution to be enacted, and isn’t it time yet to do so?

I mean, why would politicians actually go out of our their way to do anything truly beneficial for their communities when it’s far easier to hold up that gruel bowl and to just continue to jury rig the MPC with these odd legislative Band-Aids that do more harm than good? This is exactly the case in my humble opinion with PA HB 2151 of 2026. Josh Shapiro and his corporate buddies and lobbyists want it, yes? It’s not all about them yet is it?

This has barely been introduced five minutes ago quite literally and it’s already being warp speed turbo charged fast tracked. All by edict of the Governor and his cozy relationships with AI and data center folks, yes? A VOTE IS SCHEDULED FOR TOMORROW ALREADY. We know how slow stuff moves in Harrisburg, yet this is all polished and ready to go? Mmmkay.

You all will remember HB 502 from 2025:

https://triblive.com/opinion/megan-mcdonough-hb-502-is-a-betrayal-of-local-communities/

https://www.pennlive.com/opinion/2025/07/bill-502-must-be-scrapped-opinion.html

PA HB 502 of 2025 is kind of a political cousin to PA 2151 of 2026. It kind of interesting that you can’t find articles about it now and PA 2151 is very hard to locate on a simple internet search. It’s hiding in plain sight hoping it’ll get passed PDQ.

PA HB 2151 will literally remove rights from municipalities regarding data centers. It’s not some nice and nicely how to guide which is how it’s being misrepresented by state reps and presented.

The good news is state reps are almost always constantly running for office because it’s a two-year term. We as Pennsylvania’s need to remind them. They can’t rest on their laurels and hope the Democrats are going to save them because this is a partisan bill. We don’t have much time to ratchet it up here and we need to get busy. It’s already happening but you can do your part contact your state rep. Tell them simply PA HB5121 is not for the good of Pennsylvania. You need to tell them if they like being a state rep they don’t want this to be their Waterloo.

Now I want show you who’s involved with the bill. And please note there is still one obvious Chester County State Reps who is a sponsor. Sappey and I am very disappointed in her, and Danielle Friel Otten who ran initially as a pipeline activist, has apparently removed herself (more below). Of course former Radnor Township Commissioner who often looks like a muppet with those bangs who is now a Delaware County State Rep named Lisa Borowski is on it as well, which doesn’t surprise me because all she does is bend over in Harrisburg, for whatever she is told to do, doesn’t she? And yes, that does sound vulgar, but that’s an opinion of how people see her.

(Actually any sponsor or co-sponsor on this bill should be sent kneepads with Josh Shapiro‘s face on them shouldn’t they? )

Your data center issue potentially appearing in your community is your new pipeline. It’s your new condo building you don’t want. It’s your new apartment building. It’s also your new warehouse that you don’t want. The common denominator here is they need to comprehensively update the PA Municipalities Planning Code yet what do they want to do? Shove data centers in everywhere. Now I’m gonna show you who the Bill sponsors are here and then I’m going to segue to a piece of Pennsylvania in Lackawanna County that you didn’t know existed- Archbald. Why is this little area? That’s a big big acreage area called Archbald important? They’re trying to shove 400 acres are better of data center up there. This area is a proposed location for several large-scale data center projects, notably the Wildcat Ridge Data Center Campus (14 buildings) and “Project Gravity” (7 buildings) by Western Hospitality Partners, sparking significant local debate over environmental impact (water, power) and proximity to residential areas

https://www.wnep.com/article/news/local/lackawanna-county/residents-voice-concerns-over-archbald-data-center-plan-lackawanna-county-project-gravity/523-af1be776-d2dd-4cdd-945d-b1342cf4e8c5

The media is BARELY talking about this Archbald stuff state-wide and only one report on this HB 2151.

https://local21news.com/news/local/dirty-data-centers-opponents-claim-shapiro-backed-data-centers-must-be-stopped-pa-pennsylvania-politics-data-centers-house-energy-committee

Here are the names I found on the data center bill HB2151 via Legiscan https://legiscan.com/PA/bill/HB2151/2025:

Rep. Kyle Donahue [D]

Rep. Kyle Mullins [D]

Rep. Benjamin Waxman [D]

Rep. James Prokopiak [D]

Rep. Danielle Otten [D]

Rep. Jose Giral [D]

Rep. Joseph Webster [D]

Rep. Nikki Rivera [D]

Rep. Christina Sappey [D]

Rep. La’Tasha Mayes [D]

Rep. Lisa Borowski [D]

Rep. Ben Sanchez [D]

Rep. Steven Malagari [D]

Rep. Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz [D]

Rep. Heather Boyd [D]

Rep. Mandy Steele [D]

Rep. Dan Frankel [D]

Rep. Melissa Cerrato [D]

Rep. Gregory Scott [D]

If you want to FedEx, these people kneepads, you can go to their office page, you will get the addresses. Of course I’m actually kidding with the kneepads but it’s apropos in my opinion.

I must note that since I started this post earlier today, Rep. Danielle Otten has apparently removed herself from the bill. However, there is no public announcement of this by here, and shouldn’t there be? Otherwise it makes people wonder, right? If you are standing with the people, please say so. Here are the screen shots that pertain to this and see updated list here:

https://www.palegis.us/legislation/bills/2025/hb2151

HOWEVER, she is NOT off on this PA link: https://legiscan.com/PA/bill/HB2151/2025

So giddy up fellow Pennsylvanians and stop this thing. It deserves to be stopped. This bill diminishes our rights to have a say in the shape of our communities. Plus there are very real environmental and other issues with regard to data centers. Google Louden County Virginia and other places which have been negatively impacted. Here in Chester County and throughout PA, it’s starting to feel like every day brings another data center plan. It’s time to slow their roll.

Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot

oh my east pikeland, that is something, yes?

Now we all know East Pikeland doesn’t like sunshine, but it’s a clear and brilliant day and something that has hit my desk. Kind of interesting:

Gosh East Pikeland, your slip is showing…again. I will note that this is a document that is filed with the courts and not a state secret. And this attorney and his firm? They don’t play.

Grab the popcorn. Happy Friday!

I feel the need to point that out since they didn’t like that I posted something else not a state secret…in November.

the east whiteland data center documents post.

Current Beast of a Plan.

In order to help residents understand how ODD the whole data center process has been in East Whiteland, I will load in documents taken off of the township website.

So back before COVID when data center stuff started being floated, it was a smaller plan. Much smaller like 78,000 square feet and it was going to have a solar field to assist self-sufficiency.

I didn’t rust that then. Why? Because the name we always hear with Green Fig the most, Charles Lyddane, was a financial services professional for decades prior to this. Research indicates he started at Xerox and moved onto financial services at Merrill Lynch and Legg Mason. Translation: that background = money driven, fees and commission driven, correct?

And then all of these Democrats think he’s wunderbar? Do they know how he ran as an endorsed Republican School Board candidate circa 2013? Allow me to quote and old Patch almost press release post as in not a regular article:

https://patch.com/pennsylvania/malvern/bp–charles-lyddane-endorsed-for-school-board

Charles Lyddane endorsed for School Board
EastWhitelandGOP,Neighbor

Posted Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:50 pm ET
Updated Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:20 pm ET

Local Republican Committees Jointly Endorse GVSD School Board Candidate Charles Lyddane

Great Valley – On March 9, 2013 Republican committee people representing Republican voters living in Great Valley’s School Board Region II (parts of Republican Areas 9 and 10) endorsed Charlie Lyddane for School Board…After an open process soliciting community input and prominently posting a notice in Malvern Patch seeking interested and qualified candidates for Great Valley School Board, the committee representing Republican voters in Region II met the candidates and caucused, endorsing Charlie Lyddane by a two -thirds vote.

 According to Bill Tickner, Committee member and Willistown community leader, “Charlie Lyddane is the businessman we need to represent the Great Valley School community on the School Board. I am proud and pleased that Charlie a pro-education Great Valley parent with a strong background in finance and business development has stepped up to put those skills to work on our behalf. We need someone like Charlie who’s willing to steward scarce taxpayer resources into classroom education first..Mr. Lyddane has lived in Great Valley School District for 15 years and has graduated two children from the District. A graduate of Union College in Schenectady, NY, Mr. Lyddane has a BA in History and also attended the Business School at Union. He started his career at Xerox. He was Vice President of Merrill Lynch and Legg Mason in West Chester for 23 years. As a real estate developer and investor in Chester County for the past 9 years, Mr. Lyddane has significant experience in budget development and implementation, as well as achieving strategic goals in a timely and cost efficient manner. He also has significant experience in Property Management.

 According to Mr. Lyddane, “When you are managing shareholder’s money, you must produce a product that is beneficial to those shareholders. 

Boom there it is – “you must produce a product that is beneficial to those shareholders.”

That tells you what you need to know, doesn’t it? It’s not about community, or the environment or anything altruistic, just good old fashioned green backs right?

Before I go back to the data center of it all, one more article from his life before Green Fig which makes you wonder is this just like another stock pick? Is this why all of the back and forth?

https://www.wealthmanagement.com/wealth-management-industry-trends/acting-on-his-own

Acting on His Own
Some brokers almost cringe at the term “stock-picker.” It can conjure up visions of reps with frayed nerves and churned accounts.Not Charlie Lyddane.”I’m not ashamed to admit that I pick stocks,” says Lyddane, a soloist at Legg Mason in West Chester, Pa. “It’s what a broker is supposed to do. My clients like that kind of help.”Apparently so. Lyddane reports $1 million in production and $120 million

Charlie Lyddane
December 1, 2000

…Some brokers almost cringe at the term “stock-picker.” It can conjure up visions of reps with frayed nerves and churned accounts.

Not Charlie Lyddane.

“I’m not ashamed to admit that I pick stocks,” says Lyddane, a soloist at Legg Mason in West Chester, Pa. “It’s what a broker is supposed to do. My clients like that kind of help.”…Apparently so. Lyddane reports $1 million in production and $120 million under management. He’s been a broker for 19 years and has never been part of a team.

“I’ve never had the opportunity to have or need a partnership,” Lyddane says. “Besides, I like doing things on my own. No one will care about my clients like I do.”

He thinks it’s wrong to hand off client service. “My clients pay to deal with me,” Lyddane says. “I craft stock portfolios of blue chips with a bent toward technology. I’m their single source, and I like being responsible.”

He is responsible – literally.

With 400 clients and 1,000 accounts, Lyddane uses discretionary account management as a time-saving technique….Although he does his own thing, Lyddane appreciates the help he gets from the firm. “Legg Mason supports a number of teams, but I’ve found them to be very supportive of what I do. I have a great arrangement.”

Anyway, the solar field idea disappeared and then they wanted these box things they called pods. Then I think those disappeared because of maybe crypto currency concerns?

I heard a while back that PECO said something like that data center would be like the second largest site next to the City of Philadelphia and if so, how crazy is that?

Someone I know wrote today:

The Limerick Nuclear plant generates about 2300 MWH (megawatt hours) of electricity per day (with two reactors) enough for 2 million homes

The new proposed data center in town is expected to use about 100-600 MWH.

Or 8% to as much as 48% of the ENTIRE OUTPUT of a single reactor. For one data center. The equivalent of 500,000 homes.

It could actually be MORE than the energy equivalent of 500,000 homes, couldn’t it be?

We have a weak and problematic power grid already – when we have outages they will be first served (residents will get pushed down the grid) and all those diesel generators right? And then you just have to wonder HOW MANY TIMES IS EAST WHITELAND GOING TO LET THIS GUY TRY TO TWEAK A PLAN THAT ALWAYS SEEMS TO HAVE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES WHICH MEANS WHY NOT AN ENTIRE NEW SUBMISSION?

When the Philadelphia Inquirer wrote an article about this in 2023, I was interviewed. What I said was:

I’m not against responsible development, But when you’re talking about new kinds of technology and new kinds of factories, basically, you need the most updated [municipal] codes available, and our current codes are out of date…We don’t want to repeat the mistakes of the past.

The past I was in part thinking of is the lithium contamination etc. that was Foote Mineral. Foote was an EPA site. There was a review of the site in 2024, but well, the whole data center of it all wasn’t supposed to be that ginormous yet was it?

https://semspub.epa.gov/work/03/2399721.pdf

To quote the 2024 site review:

After ceasing operations in 1991, the Site owner at the time, Cyprus Foote Mineral Company, arranged for the removal of equipment and for demolition of remaining buildings down to their foundations. In 1998, Frazer Exton Development, LP (FED) purchased the original Property (Parcel 42-3-130) and assumed responsibility for cleaning up the Site. FED also installed a single cap over both the North Quarry and South Quarry as part of cleanup activities. In December 2016, Whiteland Holdings, LP (WH), the holder of the first mortgage on the Property, foreclosed and acquired the Property from FED. In a deed recorded on August 15, 2019, WH sold parcel 42-3-130.2 to Green Fig Land LLC, and on January 31, 2022, WH sold parcel 42-3-130 to Green Fig 11.33 LLC2. At the time of this FYR’s October 2023 Site inspection, the 42-3-130 and 42-3-130.2 parcel owner had, on several occasions, permitted a local electric company to use some uncapped areas of the Site as a laydown space to store lumber. The area is not in constant use. The current 42-3-130 and 42-3-130.2 parcel owner intends to redevelop parcel 42-3-130.2 as the location for a data farm facility. In 2024, construction activities for the data farm facility were initiated on parcel 42-3-130.2.

(2For clarity purposes, Green Fig Land LLC and Green Fig 11.33 LLC are owned by the same individual.)

https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0301103

October 2022
January 2023

https://www.inquirer.com/real-estate/commercial/data-centers-proposed-suburban-chester-county-pennsylvania-20230119.html

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/1547-csr-planning-2-million-sq-ft-150mw-campus-outside-philadelphia-pennsylvania

https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/southeastern-pa/data-center-company-to-develop-up-to-2m-square-feet-of-space-in-chester-county/article_46cf3574-2932-11ed-ac4d-ebeb3896d54e.html

https://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/news/2021/08/03/new-pa-tax-exemption-development-jobs.html

Not Everyone Is Sold on the Benefits of Amazon’s Data Center
Coming to Falls Township – August 2025

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220830005696/en/fifteenfortyseven-Critical-Systems-Realty-Adds-over-100-Acres-and-150-Megawatts-in-Pennsylvania-for-Massive-Data-Center-Expansion

https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7080

And of course there is a sneaky bill getting fast tracked through Harrisburg as we speak. HB5121. If you google it before reading it, benignly it is described as “which aims to assist Pennsylvania municipalities in regulating data centers through a model zoning ordinance.”

BULLSHIT. This is that thing they talked about in 2025 that would remove rights from municipalities rendering them helpless in certain zoning situation. It does a band aid slither into the municipalities planning code so there is zoning on data centers. Data Centers can pop up anywhere. It arrives just in time for the Governor to announce his re-election bid. Essentially Johnny Frackenstein (AKA Governor Josh Shapiro) wants to remove local control for communities to reject this. State run and controlled everything and aren’t we experiencing enough of that at present in Washington DC in general? This is a bad bill that has data center developers and operators all wet at the prospect (sorry, yes that’s gross but true.)

Anyway, it’s up to people to turn out in East Whiteland until this thing is for the people and not at the expense of the people. And if you care, look up who is on HB 5121 and give them a ringy dingy and say WTF (just politely.)

https://www.palegis.us/legislation/bills/2025/hb2151

Here’s the hot mess of East Whiteland. Obviously not everything, but enough to make your head spin:

(How do you have an acoustic study when something is not live in an area? Is it like those traffic studies which are you get what you pay for?)

east whiteland needs to say NO to supersizing/upsizing the data center still being constructed!

This is a Ginny Kerslake photo, originally.

Let’s be clear about the data center here. What was originally approved and allowed by East Whiteland you’re not going to cancel that BUT given the size and the expansion they want to do on something that is not yet open and proves it needs. It is like a whole other plan and shoukd be treated as such, right??

Now the data center developer wants to upgrade some technology and move some stuff around. If that is hypothetically beneficial to his plan and would be beneficial to the residents that’s one thing but that does NOT mean the developer should just get a gimme supersizing prize of a half built project not up and running, does it?

And I hear that East Whiteland is putting a live stream on for this very heated topic. Their reticence with that is they don’t want to be hacked again (happened with Zoom) and have to see porn but you know what? how many other municipalities still do Zoom every week? Maybe their Internet safety protocol isn’t strong enough? The planning commission is but the opening salvo here.

Anyway as per East Whiteland’s website:

The Applicant for the proposed Data Center on Swedesford Road will attend the upcoming Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, January 28, 2026 at 7:00pm (Livestream Available via Link Below)

The Applicant for the proposed Data Center on Swedesford Road will attend the upcoming Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, January 28, 2026 at 7:00pm to present an Amended Plan for the project. In addition to in-person attendance, the meeting will be available to Livestream via the Township Website using the link below. Public comment may be submitted via email to bcarosello@eastwhiteland.org. Please submit comments by 4:00pm on Wednesday.

LIVE STREAM

People need to make sure that they tell every single supervisor and Township staff (politely) if they don’t want this. And they can’t just do it on social media. You have to zoom into the meetings, go to the meetings, send emails. Call media you know to cover it. Residents and those concerned need to make the time, not excuses.

If residents had paid more attention around 2022 when this whole thing was going through initial approval process, maybe we wouldn’t be here today but we will never know as that ship sailed. What hasn’t sailed is the developer does not have the Divine Right of Kings to make his project bigger, does he? That wasn’t what was approved, and it has to go through a whole new planning process from top to the bottom or it should right? I mean a 629,830 square foot increase is not smidge larger is it? “1,026,800 s.f. to 1,656,630 s.f. (along with related increases in building coverage and impervious coverage)” is quite a bit larger, yes?

And people from East Whiteland are contacting East Whiteland about the 55+ development that was approved years ago unavoidably in West Whiteland. Again, that ship sailed. I told people here and people told people other places about all those meetings, and the residents did not pay attention. And the problem with that project is under the Municipalities Planning Code so it was approved. And until that weighty outdated tome in Harrisburg is comprehensively updated to protect our communities, they are going to be targeted by developers for whatever is going to make them the most money in that minute and that is the truth isn’t it?

Also to be noted is there are many many West Whiteland residents who are concerned about the potential supersizing of this data center. They had to deal with this developer when he wanted to put a hydrogen hub right next to their park right in the same area. And that didn’t happen because the residents and supervisors stood up and took action.

In my humble opinion, the supervisors in East Whiteland need to be on the same page as the residents when it comes to data centers. If that developer wants to improve technology, that is mutually beneficial to all or tweak design on plan size approved, that is one thing, and it’s something they should want to do for their bottom line in the future, right? But we are already seeing changes in our power grid from data centers. We run the risk of having well water polluted by these data centers. There are other ways it is harmful to the environment and then there is the sheer noise. So East Whiteland approved a data center and it’s not up and running yet so there is no actual proof that is supersizing is needed at this juncture, is there? It is a developer want, it is not a developer need in my opinion and I’m allowed to have that.

I also of the opinion that we cannot depend on the planning commission to say no to this. I don’t think they have the knowledge necessary to do anything other than pass it along with a rubber stamp. In my opinion, I think they are all going to say unless people turn out and protest that “oh it’s OK. It’s better for people. It’ll bring lots of business and tax revenue” or whatever platitudes get blown up people’s rear ends and there’s no proof that it will do any of those things, but that’s what they’re told isn’t it?

This is who is on the planning commission:

Deborah Abel, Chair
Todd Asousa, Vice Chair
Bob Logan
Bill Wrabley
John Laumer
Tim Kelly
Jaime Damiani

Go to https://www.eastwhiteland.org/ for more information on this project and for telephone numbers and email addresses, etc.

https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/columbus/report-links-data-center-to-rare-cancers-raising-questions-about-central-ohioans-safety

This was a superfund site – EPA- Foote Mineral. The planning commission should know that you can’t just come in with a resubmission like this- it has to start the clock again with a resubmission- where is the impact study? What is the complete feasibility? Planning needs to restart the clock if the developer wishes to expand, isn’t that a truism? Who inspects? Who is the monitoring agency? So many variables.

As Ginny Kerslake said TWO days ago:

I just saw this photo (minus the X) posted elsewhere. I feel compelled to address it because it’s the kind of messaging that is counterproductive to protecting our communities and the environment.

It’s the kind of messaging we get from some politicians talking out both sides of their mouth, and from the industry itself, giving false assurance that they won’t pollute or deplete our resources because there are strict environmental regulations in place.

It’s false.

We don’t HAVE anywhere close to adequate rules in place to protect our air and water from this buildout of AI data centers and power plants to fuel them – not to mention protect climate and communities.

Workers? These hyper scale data centers create very few jobs once built – and the intent is to eliminate workers.

And we have a Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection that has a history of turning a blind eye to violations by certain industries. And it’s led by a Secretary who has been engaged in backroom dealmaking with these corporations and has promised to deliver Amazon with the “highest level of service, accountability and urgency to meet their project needs”. (See letter in comments obtained through a RTK request.

Let’s not pretend the situation in Pennsylvania is anything different.

And what Ginny said was similarly said by a dear friend today who keeps asking Harrisburg WHO is responsible for watching Data Centers? WHO is the monitoring agency? I mean those who live with the PA DEPs inconsistency in their communities know this is a problem. WHO watches and who watchdogs the entities who are supposed to watch?

Also from Ginny:

Oh, and my opinions are bought to me by the First Amendment. They haven’t repealed that yet as far as I know.

Other things I found:

https://law.justia.com/cases/pennsylvania/superior-court/2024/968-eda-2023.html

From the other day:

meeting alerts: green fig wants to make east whiteland data center being built BIGGER!

This is a Ginny Kerslake photo originally

Ok residents, the weekend surprise is essentially the data center developer building in East Whiteland wants to make it BIGGER.

We have a proverbial foot in the door scenario, and IMHO East Whiteland never should have allowed the foot to get there in the first place and I am allowed to have this opinion under the First Amendment.

To QUOTE the township:

📌The Applicant for the proposed Data Center on Swedesford Road will attend the upcoming Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, January 28, 2026 to present an Amended Plan for the project. The Amended Plan differs from the Previously Approved Plan as follows:

  • total building square footage has increased from 1,026,800 s.f. to 1,656,630 s.f. (along with related increases in building coverage and impervious coverage)
  • cooling equipment has been redesigned and relocated from the ground immediately adjacent to the buildings (water-consuming cooling towers) to the rooftop (waterless rooftop chillers) along with corresponding sound mitigation barriers
  • emergency back-up generators have been relocated from the basement of the buildings to the ground immediately adjacent to the buildings along with corresponding sound mitigation barriers
  • office uses and loading facilities have been relocated from the southern side of the buildings to the northern side of the buildings facing Swedesford Road
  • additional trees and landscaping have been proposed on the former sewer lagoons located between the development site and Swedesford Road
  • design and location of stormwater management facilities, parking lots, and internal circulation areas have been modified
  • previously proposed microwave towers, antenna yards, and ground-mounted cooling towers have been removed

The Amended Plans can be found on the Subdivision & Land Development Applications page of the Township Website (refer to 2025-08-ALD Green Fig).📌

East Whiteland Township needs to say NO and they need to enable Zoom capability for ALL meetings where this is concerned given the weather and number of residents and neighbors who will be interested.

Again… the weekend surprise is essentially the data center developer for the East Whiteland Data Center on Swedesford next to West Whiteland park land, wants to make it BIGGER.

East Whiteland Township needs to say NO and they need to enable Zoom capability for ALL meetings where this is concerned given the weather and number of residents and neighbors who will be interested.

When we (myself and others) posted about this data center first happening a few years ago, very few people were interested. It was the chorus of crickets.

Recently, some people seemed like they were interested in this again and people wondered where they were a couple of years ago. This is the same developer that West Whiteland turned down for the hydrogen plant.

Once upon a time, I think this developer was like a stock broker or a money manager, but then he saw the dollar signs here didn’t he? So that’s fine if this is his chosen career path, but he shouldn’t detrimentally affect residents in multiple municipalities should he?

I make no secret of the fact that I always thought this was too big a plan for Swedesford Road. And at the time I couldn’t believe the people in developments across the road didn’t seem bothered by this.

Here are some interesting comments so far:

If you Google the project, here’s what comes up (in part):

Key Project Details

  • Location: 760 Swedesford Road, Malvern, Chester County, Pennsylvania.
  • Capacity: Planned for 290 MW of power, with significant capacity for 2 million square feet of development.
  • Partnership: A joint venture between Green Fig Land Company and 1547 Critical Systems Realty.
  • lol Features: Designed for hyperscale users with potential rooftop solar (up to 7 MW) and high-density, interconnected capabilities. 

Sorry, not sorry but residents and residents of neighboring municipalities had better wake up this time around.

The bell on the original data center being built, can’t be on wrong, but residents should have a say and be able to say no to making it bigger.

https://www.facebook.com/share/1BytbBQCvU/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Google Louden County, Virginia and check out Ginny Kerslake’s Facebook page about her recent visit to Louden County, Virginia.

https://cms2.revize.com/revize/eastwhitelandtownshippa/Documents/Government/Departments/Planning%20And%20Development/Land%20Developments%20Applications/2025/Amended%20Waiver%20Request%20Letter.pdf?t=202512081126160&t=202512081126160

https://cms2.revize.com/revize/eastwhitelandtownshippa/Documents/Government/Departments/Planning%20And%20Development/Land%20Developments%20Applications/2025/Acoustic%20Study%20Report.pdf?t=202512081123450&t=202512081123450

https://cms2.revize.com/revize/eastwhitelandtownshippa/Documents/Government/Departments/Planning%20And%20Development/Land%20Developments%20Applications/2025/Data%20Centers%20LD%20Plans.pdf?t=202512081127020&t=202512081127020

https://cms2.revize.com/revize/eastwhitelandtownshippa/Documents/Government/Departments/Planning%20And%20Development/Land%20Developments%20Applications/2025/Amended%20Project%20Narrative.pdf?t=202512081125330&t=202512081125330

Address: 209 Conestoga Road Frazer, Pa. 19355
Phone: 610-648-0600

Here are email addresses if you wish to contact East Whiteland and ask them to enable Zoom for all meetings where this will be discussed:

bcarosello@eastwhiteland.org

sbrown@eastwhiteland.org

pfixler@eastwhiteland.org

slambert@eastwhiteland.org

csmith@eastwhiteland.org

https://www.eastwhiteland.org/news_detail_T2_R136.php

Old articles and other links:

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/1547-csr-planning-2-million-sq-ft-150mw-campus-outside-philadelphia-pennsylvania/

https://baxtel.com/data-center/1547-chester-county-pa

https://www.commercialsearch.com/news/2-msf-philly-data-center-project-moves-forward/

Excerpt from 2024:

A neighboring site offers an additional 5 million square feet of development potential.

fifteenfortyseven Critical Systems Realty and Green Fig Land Co. have unveiled the latest advancements at their 100-acre hyperscale data center developmentoutside Philadelphia that could eventually comprise up to 2 million square feet of space. Lease options are now available for build-to-suit, powered shell and turnkey data center space.

Located about 20 miles northwest of Philadelphia in East Whiteland Township, Pa., the site was acquired by GFLC and 1547 in 2022. The development firm had previously received the local authorities’ approval to construct two data centers of about 1 million square feet each. An adjacent property is available for the development of data center buildings totaling up to 5 million square feet.

https://vista.today/2024/01/data-center-in-chester-county/

https://www.inquirer.com/real-estate/commercial/data-centers-proposed-suburban-chester-county-pennsylvania-20230119.html

https://baxtel.com/data-center/1547-chester-county-pa

https://www.lightwaveonline.com/data-center/article/14282043/fifteenfortyseven-green-fig-land-co-partner-for-new-pennsylvania-data-center-campus

(Articles may have pay walls, if so not my job to unlock them, sorry)